He claims I'm both a klan member and a neo-nazi despite the fact that:
I'm not a Christian.
I've never supported any neo-nazi or klan groups.
That he is wrong, wrong, wrong all the time.
He has tried to argue with me on the merits of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the real threat of Communism, and other topics which he knows little or nothing about!
Check out the post in which the debate occured:
http://priscusforem.blogspot.com/2008/01/my-response-to-ray-comforts-something.html
Oh dear, the shit has hit the fan, has it not?
Psycho Dave should just shove those bagpipes of his up his ass.
Monday, January 28, 2008
Friday, January 25, 2008
A little two cents on the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
---This is a follow-up to my "Psycho Dave says Ron Paul is a nutcase" post.---
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is applauded as a great achievement in 20th Century U.S. History. But is it really? Were not blacks already getting their prestige and rights? Did not the Civil Rights Act simply HAMPER them and make them evil in the eyes of the rest of America? Is it not a bill asking for blacks and certain other groups to have more and more until they have more than everyone else? Were not the civil rights leaders (who were black) racist? Maybe not Martin Luther King Jr, but he had horrible traits. He beat up women, and he was a lousy Communist. He also embarrassed the United States by complaining about the injustices he was suffering, which I'm not sure what were, since he was not very clear. Go figure. Also, my big beef with the Act is, I admit it, it hurts business and the private sector. The Business and Private Sectors ARE people too, and deserve the same rights, and no Act inspired by a Communist should hinder them.
If that's the image of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, I say we do away with it and start fresh. Let Blacks and Gays get their rights naturally, not hand it to them. Let them prove themselves!
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is applauded as a great achievement in 20th Century U.S. History. But is it really? Were not blacks already getting their prestige and rights? Did not the Civil Rights Act simply HAMPER them and make them evil in the eyes of the rest of America? Is it not a bill asking for blacks and certain other groups to have more and more until they have more than everyone else? Were not the civil rights leaders (who were black) racist? Maybe not Martin Luther King Jr, but he had horrible traits. He beat up women, and he was a lousy Communist. He also embarrassed the United States by complaining about the injustices he was suffering, which I'm not sure what were, since he was not very clear. Go figure. Also, my big beef with the Act is, I admit it, it hurts business and the private sector. The Business and Private Sectors ARE people too, and deserve the same rights, and no Act inspired by a Communist should hinder them.
If that's the image of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, I say we do away with it and start fresh. Let Blacks and Gays get their rights naturally, not hand it to them. Let them prove themselves!
Psycho Dave says Ron Paul is a nutcase. Surprised?
"Ron Paul is a nut-job. He's also kind of an Archie-Bunker racist."
Here are the words of a misguided stupid white liberal. Ron Paul is a nut-job? What? Of course, he did not elaborate on why he is a nut-job, or why he is an Archie-Bunker (whatever this) racist. Here was my clean cut excellent response to him:
"More on Ron Paul.
How is he exactly a nut-job? He stands for ending America's imperial wars, and is for total freedom, isn't that your stances?
About him being a racist, you are probably referring to him being against the civil rights act and his alleged racist newsletter.
To focus first on the newsletter, it's already been debunked, HE DIDN'T write it, it was someone else, he was totally unaware of what was going on, you can not blame him.
Now on the civil rights act. THE CIVIL rights act is total bullshit, period. IT HAS done no good. Progress should be allowed to happen naturally, it can not be forced. It has had negative effects on the black community, and I think non racism has indeed happened naturally, in spite of the civil rights act.
The damage it has done to the black community has that it destroyed the (wile rare, but existing) millionaire black communities, when the civil rights act was passed, it had black people go to white communities to buy things, which in turn, devestated the few well off black communities, and now the only rich black people are dumbass gangster rappers. If we let things happen naturally, these well off black communities would have grown.
Oh, I also oppose it because businesses SHOULD have the freedom to segregate. Businesses should have the same rights as people.
Ron Paul Revolution."
Do I need to go any further? Well, no, but I will. I think Psycho Dave is not only distorted in his religious views, but also political. Something has convinced him that damaging, dangerous liberal (liberals in the U.S. have basically ushered us into every major war we've been in, and there's more to that) politics and stick by them no matter what. EVEN if it means denigrating a great man like Dr. Paul.
Go to Hell, Psycho Dave. Ron Paul Revolution!
Here are the words of a misguided stupid white liberal. Ron Paul is a nut-job? What? Of course, he did not elaborate on why he is a nut-job, or why he is an Archie-Bunker (whatever this) racist. Here was my clean cut excellent response to him:
"More on Ron Paul.
How is he exactly a nut-job? He stands for ending America's imperial wars, and is for total freedom, isn't that your stances?
About him being a racist, you are probably referring to him being against the civil rights act and his alleged racist newsletter.
To focus first on the newsletter, it's already been debunked, HE DIDN'T write it, it was someone else, he was totally unaware of what was going on, you can not blame him.
Now on the civil rights act. THE CIVIL rights act is total bullshit, period. IT HAS done no good. Progress should be allowed to happen naturally, it can not be forced. It has had negative effects on the black community, and I think non racism has indeed happened naturally, in spite of the civil rights act.
The damage it has done to the black community has that it destroyed the (wile rare, but existing) millionaire black communities, when the civil rights act was passed, it had black people go to white communities to buy things, which in turn, devestated the few well off black communities, and now the only rich black people are dumbass gangster rappers. If we let things happen naturally, these well off black communities would have grown.
Oh, I also oppose it because businesses SHOULD have the freedom to segregate. Businesses should have the same rights as people.
Ron Paul Revolution."
Do I need to go any further? Well, no, but I will. I think Psycho Dave is not only distorted in his religious views, but also political. Something has convinced him that damaging, dangerous liberal (liberals in the U.S. have basically ushered us into every major war we've been in, and there's more to that) politics and stick by them no matter what. EVEN if it means denigrating a great man like Dr. Paul.
Go to Hell, Psycho Dave. Ron Paul Revolution!
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Psycho Dave: Wrong about Sanger.
Psycho Dave has recently made a post defending Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, as a hero and champion of sexual rights, and that she is unfairly demonized by certain groups of people. Nothing could be further from the truth. Despite the fact that I, as an Ignostic, do not oppose contraceptives or abortion, I do oppose Margaret Sanger and the Planned Parenthood, vanguards for future infiltration of the United States by Nazis and eugenicist.
Psycho Dave claims Margaret Sanger had NO racist views whatsoever, but a simple google search found this website was the fifth result when simply searching her name:
http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html
Black Genocide ORG is a website fighting racism against blacks in the United States, and guess what it dug up about ol' Sanger:
At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.
Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."
That's not all. Here Sanger herself basically equates herself to brutal dictators in the third world by promoting forced sterilization:
Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.
Psycho Dave represents a type of atheist that is rather disruptive and gives Atheism and non-religiosity a bad name. He's the kind of guy who bitches and moans when a neighbor puts up a nativity scene, he's the kind of Atheist waging a personal war on Christmas (I'm sure he'd prefer we be forced to say Happy Holidays!) and he will back anyone who simply fits into his political and social agenda, no matter what character defines said person.
Psycho Dave claims Margaret Sanger had NO racist views whatsoever, but a simple google search found this website was the fifth result when simply searching her name:
http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html
Black Genocide ORG is a website fighting racism against blacks in the United States, and guess what it dug up about ol' Sanger:
At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.
Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."
That's not all. Here Sanger herself basically equates herself to brutal dictators in the third world by promoting forced sterilization:
Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.
Psycho Dave represents a type of atheist that is rather disruptive and gives Atheism and non-religiosity a bad name. He's the kind of guy who bitches and moans when a neighbor puts up a nativity scene, he's the kind of Atheist waging a personal war on Christmas (I'm sure he'd prefer we be forced to say Happy Holidays!) and he will back anyone who simply fits into his political and social agenda, no matter what character defines said person.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)